Saturday, December 19, 2009

I Want To Be A Deception Expert

: it's 3D

standard Blu Ray 3D è stato finalmente approvato dalla Blu Ray Disc Association e presenta un grosso passo avanti per tutto l'Home Entertaintment.
I dischi BD, attraverso il codec Multiview Video Coding (MVC), ovvero la versione tridimensionale del famoso codec H264, permetteranno la fruizione di video 1080p in 3D, se il lettore lo supporta, altrimenti risulteranno essere normali Blu Ray in 2D.
Tra le novità ci sarà anche la possibilità di avere i menù ed i sottotitoli anch'essi in 3D .
Non si parla però dello standard HDMI 1.4 come mezzo di trasporto di tale flusso e nemmeno sono state date indicazioni per quanto regards the mode of reproduction (screen type, type of glasses, etc.).
will not have to wait for the arrival of the first examples of BD 3D and the new generation of readers, with the exception of the PS3 which just wait for a firmware update available in a few weeks.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Answers To The Ultimate Element Crossword Puzzle

NEW BLUE: EXPERT WITH TOP VISION ALL BEATS

Expert , one of the largest retail chains of consumer electronics, offers something really interesting.
This TOP VISION, a package to stimulate the move to Blu-Ray , in collaboration with Philips and Warner available at all punti vendita Expert dal 5 al 21 Novembre .
Si tratta del lettore Philips BDP3000 in abbinata a ben 20 film Warner , ad un prezzo sensazionale di 199.00 euro !
Ecco i titoli:
  • Troy
  • La Sposa Cadavere
  • 10.000 A.C.
  • 2001: Odissea nello Spazio
  • Speed Racer
  • Blood Diamond
  • Come un Uragano
  • Happy feet
  • The Prestige
  • Licenza di Matrimonio
  • The Island
  • La tempesta perfetta
  • Batman
  • Ant Bully
  • Lady in the Water
  • Scooby Doo
  • Training Day
  • No Reservations
  • Agent Smart: Casino Total
  • Gangster Story

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Do Herpes In The Nose Hurt



Sunday, September 20, 2009

Brazilian Blowout Charlo

The compact digital camera as an SLR? The revolution of micro 4 / 3


pen Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic Lumix GF1 , these are the first two compact digital interchangeable lens format micro 4 / 3 (micro four thirds, or m4 / 3, or four micro Thirds) a format which has a much larger sensor of the classic compact could, in some cases equal or exceed the image quality of some digital SLRs.
Among the DPReview forums, the busiest ever in the last period is devoted to the micro 4 / 3, passing all the classics forum on compact and SLR cameras from Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, etc..!
Olympus, brought out by a few months and the pen-P1, announces big news for the 31 October and the sites of rumors already announce the E-P2 . The sensor
m4 / 3
The sensor system of micro 4 / 3, is between 5 and 6 times larger than the current average of compact sensors.
Here is a comparison between the design of sensors from the site Anandtech:

The average compact digital cameras have sensors of the current magnitude between the central squares yellow and purple, few come close to that green living is azzurro.Quello the sensor 4 / 3, as shown, far more grande.Il blue and red are the sensor of APS, the largest is the full film and the classic format of the few (and expensive ..) digital SLR Full Frame (ie full frame).

The advantages of a larger sensor

pixel being equal, a larger sensor will:

1)-plans to focus more selective (less depth of field), thus avoiding the tremendous impression " flatness "of the pictures and giving more compact three-dimensional image.
2)-Increased dynamic range image (you can see in the picture more brightness levels between black and white, and therefore more realistic with more shades of light)
3)-Greater tonal range of the image (you can see more colors and various passages between one color and one in the picture are more gradual and then more realistic)
4)-Higher quantum efficiency / less image noise in low light (the picture is "cleaner" even when you raise the ISO to take pictures in low light) Here is a comparison

image from a compact classic success, the Canon SX200, and the Olympus E-Pen P1.Entrambe have 12 megapixels, the shots are 100 ISO.Si can see all the listed differences, especially that of the background noise that is easier to see to the untrained eye (especially in the shadows):

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/SX200IS/FULLRES/SX200IShSLI0100.HTM

http:// www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EP1/FULLRES/EP1hSLI0100_NR_STD.HTM The advantage

noise between the Pen E-P1 and a compact media can be easily quantified than 2 diaframmi.Ciò means that a photo taken at ISO 1600 with the E-P1 has the same (or less ..) sound of a photograph taken at 400 with the compact camera that go to the maggiore.Ed even with those with larger sensor 200exr such as Fuji or Panasonic LX3 , the advantage is still more than a diaphragm.

General

The compact micro four thirds-again, yet are only 2, and tests of the Panasonic GF1 are still scarce - affect the image quality of APS but their body is the size of a compact . Even with the normal lens mounted restano comunque più piccole di certe compatte bridge.Sia la E-P1 che la GF1 hanno un corpo spesso 3,5 cm. circa che diventano 7 circa con lo zoom normale montato,meno ancora se montano gli appositi fissi ultrapiatti che stanno uscendo dalle case .Nei forum oltreoceano il consiglio per la E-P1 è di acquistarla con l'obiettivo in kit ,il 14-42 (corrispondente ad un classico 28-84mm sul formato fotografico a pellicola 35mm), che è dato come valido.Certo,ci sono note dolenti,come l'autofocus un pò lento dell'E-P1, l'assenza di mirini interni per entrambe o il costo ancora alto :650-750 € circa il corpo dell'E-P1 con l'obiettivo in kit .Ma se il mercato seguirà il trend che sembra affermarsi,presto i prezzi dovranno calare.
Il parco obiettivi a disposizione è già sufficiente e si sta ingrandendo.Sono anche in produzione anelli per montare gli obiettivi (anche vecchi ) delle case più famose (Canon F,Olympus OM,Leica M,Nikon F,Contax/Yashica,Pentax,ecc.) sui corpi m4/3.Va ricordato che entrambe le attuali compatte micro 4/3 fanno anche ottimi filmati in HD a 720p.

Sarà vera rivoluzione?
Sicuramente la voglia di fare foto migliori con le compatte sta crescendo.Non a caso Canon ha rivoluzionato il concetto di crescita infinita dei pixel calandoli da 15 a 10 dalla G10 alla nuova G11 ,per lasciare spazio a foto un pizzico meno definite ma senz'altro più pulite.Anche la nuova Canon S90 che segue la politica di sensori più grandi iniziata da Fuji e poi seguita da Panasonic con la LX3 è un'altro segnale in questa direzione.
Se poi sarà il micro 4/3 a vincere la battaglia del mercato nelle compatte, non è dato di saperlo,ma siamo senza dubbi all'inizio di un nuovo modo di intendere la fotografia digitale,anche quella amatoriale.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Where Can I Read Kamehasutra English Color

UPD: OPPO BDP-83 AL TAV

this is interesting news for all dedicated fans of home theater.
Audio Natali at the Top Audio Video in Milan this weekend, more precisely in the rooms at Hotel Quark -1 ATC, will present a preview of the famous Italian universal player Oppo BDP-83 .
For the final version but we still await the beginning of October, the date set for the release of the final version of the player's firmware.
Price will still be slightly higher than the U.S. market.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Extreme Curves Leight D

New Canon SX20, G11, S90, IXUS 200

La prima è la Canon Powershot SX20 IS,erede della valida SX10 ,l'antagonista diretta della Panasonic FZ28 ,queste ultime 2 le più celebri bridge ultrazoom dell'anno passato.Adesso,questo SX20 dovrà vedersela con la Panasonic FZ38 .Le novità principali sono;
-- i prevedibili 2 milioni di pixel in più (da 10 a 12),
--il filmato HD a 720p (col quale Canon colma un gap con Pana non da poco),
--l'attacco HDMI
--il flash è dato come più potente
In pratica,è una SX10 più orientata all'uso ibrido.Restano le stesse generose focali (28-560mm) e la stessa luminosità della SX10,così come resta l'utilissimo LCD snodabile da 2,5".La competizione è aperta e a breve avremo i primi test:l'impressione è che nell'update la SX20 abbia messo più impegno della FZ38,anche perchè sta uscendo quasi allo stesso prezzo (360€,circa,online),mentre la differenza di prezzo fra sx10 e fz28 non era piccola a vantaggio di quest'ultima.Le resta la lacuna del RAW che manca,ma sinceramente,coi jpeg pesanti attuali la differenza non è più così grande.La attendiamo anche sul PF,punto debole un pò di tutte le bridge ultrazoom Canon degli ultimi anni.

Coraggiosa scelta di Canon per la G11,la nuova ammiraglia della storica serie G;ha calato i megapixel a 10!!!Pensare che la G10 li aveva portati a 15...
Perderà qualcosa in risoluzione,ma finalmente avremo foto pulite grazie al sensore grande con (relativamente) pochi pixel.La famosa nebbiolina dell'ultimo algoritmo antirumore Canon finalmente si diraderà....sfoltire i megapixel è il miglior noise reduction che ci sia!
I dati dell'ottica (Focal lengths and apertures) remain the same, slightly shrinking the LCD, the flash is more powerful but, inexplicably, the movie is at 480p.
Then, a machine that enhances the call quality photo, but moves away from the use hybrid, really a machine that even in quality, risk the "niche" of pure amateur photography, more and more restricted (because there are reflex .. .) fully complete, as is traditional G-series the possibility of various manual interventions.


Then there is the Powershot S90, which is no choice but to deal directly Fuji and Pana in a segment that until recently was solely within the purview Fuji, that the compact small to large sensor, a photo made clear, even in low light to high iso.Anche here as in the G11 have been contained to 10 megapixels, sacrificing a little resolution to take down the challenge is directed to rumore.La Pana LX3 , making the same choice to put the brightness to minimum F / 2, which means an average aperture advantage over other concorrenti.La S90 has a focal length of 28-105mm, RAW and has an interesting ring that manually controls the Focal (5 steps), the ISO (in steps of 1 / 3), focus, aperture, time and exposure correction. Here, too, chose not to adopt the HD movies but to remain at 480p.I first opinions and comparisons ( here with the G10 in a 1600 iso ) Are great, but the wait here in the first test.


The new Canon Ixus 200 (SD980 in the USA) continues the successful series Ixus threading, alas, the usual 12 megapixels in a sensorino striminzito.Peccato, because it is a car with the video to 720p, HDMI, and the attack with a very attractive focal length :24-120mm, suitable for most of the photos and for tight areas where often the girls (the most loyal customers in this series) photograph groups persone.Vedremo soon ...

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Tickle Scenes In The Movies

New Panasonic FZ38, ZX1, FP8

News coming from Panasonic The most anticipated is the Lumix FZ38 (FZ35 in the U.S.), heir to a good bridge ultrazoom FZ28.Rispetto latter la 38 ha 12 megapixel anzichè 10 (ma su sensore di pari dimensioni..),un comparto video migliorato col suono stereo e con più ampie possibilità di intervento manuale sui video,tra cui vari programmi di sensibilità e la scelta dei tempi fra 1/30 e 1/20.000 (!!),una più efficace stabilizzazione foto/video in generale.La FZ38 monta il processore Venus HD che è 2,4 volte più rapido del precedente Venus 4.
L'obiettivo ha la stessa focale (27/486mm) e la stessa luminosità della FZ28.
Per quanto riguarda la qualità immagine,i test e i pareri degli users in rete sono ancora rari e contraddittori,ma ad una prima impressione aver pigiato altri 2 milioni di pixel nel sensorino potrebbe aver portato a noise equal to or worse than the FZ28, just as there is any doubt about the purple fringing.Anche more quickly in AF, which is expected to be brought from Venus HD, is not so obvious, given that a test gives the network an average of more slow FZ28.
The machine, which will have to deal with the Canon SX20 direct competitor, has already sold around 350 €, about, online.



Another novelty is the ZX1 (ZR1 in the U.S.), slim compact 12 megapixel (crushed in the usual sensorino), with a focal range (25-200mm) that allows interesting who does not have a photographic safari full range of focal lengths in a very compact machine: just 20mm thick and only 160 gr. weight.
Even the video industry is good, HD, 720p, even if the sound is mono.Attendiamo the first test.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Create Your Own Wwe Belt

New Fuji F70XR and S200EXR

announced in July and now available on the market two interesting new Fuji.



F70XR --- The first is a wide-angle compact superzoom Fuji sees fit for the first time in this increasingly crowded segment of the Panasonic TZ, SX200 from Canon, Samsung and WB500 WB550, Casio H10, etc..
The objective is a 10x (27-270mm), then con un range di focali adatto a tutte le situazioni fotografiche medie.
La carta in più di Fuji è la solita :sensore più grande rispetto alle altre case,anche se di poco.E' un
sensore da 1/2" con 10 milioni di pixel,che dovrebbe darle un leggero vantaggio sul rumore di fondo.
Peccato Fuji resti ancorata ai videoclip da 640x480.Nel 2009 è una scelta di marketing davvero incomprensibile.Forse non hanno ancora capito che non è che i nuovi acquirenti di macchine si accontentino di un pizzico di qualità immagine in più,se poi devono rinunciare ai movie HD, rinuncia alla quale invece sono disposti in pochissimi.
Sul mercato arrivano i giovani e i giovani che erano bambini negli 90 'were filled with moving images, for them the movie is too importante.Pazienza. The first tests the harm as good, but we seem to see small flaws on distortion, purple fringing , etc. .. We await further testing and will shortly publish an article / confronto.Sta exiting on 250 €, about, online.


--- Another new feature is the S200EXR, heir to the sound and mammoth bridge ultrazoom S100fs .
Unlike the first, the newcomer has a smaller sensor with more pixels (vs 12m. 11m), so in theory the picture should be un pò meno "pulita",ma il sensore è quello con tecnologia EXR,quindi ottimizzato per i tipi di ripresa.
Il nuovo modello è stato anche alleggerito e rimpicciolito (ma ancora troppo poco,siamo sugli 850 gr...) e le focali sono state leggermente spostate verso il tele (30mm anzichè 28mm in grandangolo e 436mm vs. 400mm in tele) anche questa novità non positiva.L'LCD è stato appena ingrandito (da 2,5 a 2,7").
Resta una macchina certamente competitiva rispetto alle altre bidge ultrazoom per qualità immagine,specie sul rumore di fondo delle foto, e il sensore più grande le permette anche un minimo di selettività del fuoco in più sui ritratti e laddove necessario.Anche questa Fuji no movies HD.Ecco some samples (not very useful, actually ..) of the house.
leave pending the trial and see the results in the first test rete.L 'output is next and should position itself in the range € 380-450.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

10 Week Old Baby Has Slime On His Chest

Best compact digital table in July 2009 (best point and shoot digital Room-chart)


Click on the table (click on image)
often asks what is the best compact digital camera with a superzoom or with less noise or HD quality video, etc.etc.
I have compiled a table with my views on this subject, which was updated in mid-July and on machinery output by months of various tests that are available.
Meanwhile, several new models came out, I'll make a short update the table.
(read the note below)

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Thank You Message Sample In Wedding Program

Olympus SP-590 vs Pentax X70; bridge ultrazoom compared

The Olympus SP 590 and the Pentax are 2 X70 bridge ultrazoom last generation, both with 12 megapixels and zoom to higher magnification (26x and 24x SP-590 laX70) to cover focal impensabili.Certo few years ago, of all the image quality suffers a little, but they are still machines that can give satisfaction.

Here they are compared with their benefits;


OLYMPUS SP-590




- Faster autofocus (but fallible and pushed to tele in low light)
- Macro closer (1cm. vs 10cm).
- Gust infinite
full resolution - HDMI connection
- widest focal range (26-676 vs. 26-624)
- Longer battery (410 vs. 170, CIPA)
- Remote

PENTAX X70


- Lightweight greater sharpness / resolution
- Slightly better performance at high ISO
- Movie HD 720p (but only at 15 fps)
- Use SD / SDHC

Saturday, July 18, 2009

How To Change Lens For Diana F

Banned from Forums; end of their sentence, EVER! But let us pleasure ....


BACKGROUND:

after years as a hobby to give up it.arti.fotografia.digitale imprziali and disinterested advice on hundreds of compact digital cameras people, a little tired, I do a blog on compact personal satisfaction. Taken

initial enthusiasm of any business, I join the forum HWupgrade, the site that I follow for years (more for computers for photography ...) knowing attended by many people trying to find a compact board .
THE FACTS:
For the first 2 post I talk about my blog, just started putting the link.
It is banned from the moderator with late penalty "never".
big words.
Ask for explanations, with much effort and many allusions to bevendomi my supposed cunning and invitations not to write on the forum (?!?!!) but to deal with my blog (and here I find it hard to understand that logic is that of reason and label, so even though I eventually realized that they are basically commercial concerns, the usual money).
Ok, I say, the world is a jungle, and I admit that I have read a bit of a hurry the rules, but you see I'm not an advertisement, does not spout a penny, and put links to articles and impartial USEFUL FOR USERS .
That is, in true spirit of service to people in need, those who go on the Internet to look for a service and that the sites, in theory, should help and encourage.
And this, in a world based on money and interest, blast patterns (and not only ..) a lot people.
be asked to resubscribe but, in essence, being very careful not to furbeggiare yet. Oh well, hate this absurd way to talk to a person who does not know (I am a man of another era, but I have not taught so) and I also thank, very kind.


THE DEATH PENALTY
After a couple of months in which hundreds of people to help choose the car, suddenly I come with another ribannato "Finish the sentence, EVER!" Final time ( hopefully not send me home .. even the police). Reason
-Hear, hear! - Have put the link on my blog articles incredibly useful to consumers, Pure service, like this:

with audio data of 25 compact that I downloaded and analyzed by myself for hours and that they are not rare even in Italy and around the global web, and then, quite a valuable thing for consumers to enhance and encourage.
Or like this:

where you deal with a badly neglected aspect: the effective resolution of HD movies, sometimes a little bad, something to which consumers are not accustomed attenzione.Cosa not to provide small, so.
or links to specific comparisons between the two machines made in the blog, when a member of the forum asked specifically a comparison between the two machines indecision (often, naturally, for example between the FZ28 and the SX10,). Etc., etc., etc. and it still without strength, in a manner appropriate to the context and demands, and at very least of the posts that do not "spammed", often lengthy and analytical about the defects or merits of this or that machine, etc..
THE FUTURE
This was annoying. The
to know why the Tech Support, they told me that "spammed" (link to helpful articles, impartial e senza NESSUN interesse, ed apprezzati da gente che ti ringrazia ,lo chiamano "spammare"...).
Non è sicuramente "colpa" del moderatore che banna,ma di un sistema,di un modo arcaico di pensare,far le cose e misurare le persone.Oppure,di un regolamento superato.
Credo che questo modo di gestire i forum morirà presto,perchè le persone, noi internauti,in rete come nella società siamo stanchi dei potenti burocrati che silurano le cose positive.
Ma ci vorrà ancora un pò di tempo.
Nel frattempo ,sul mio blog ho tolto il link del forum di HWupgrade e mi iscriverò ad altri forum e siti per rafforzarli con le mie conoscenze.
Credo,modestamente,che yesterday by the user who goes on HWupgrade to seek advice on digital compact is a little poorer.
I feel sorry for him, but he will go on without him, if they so wish.
This blog has the strength, and most of the requests I get from other sources. One thing I
the grant, said Alberto Sordi as
:
"HWUPGRADE FORUM!! PRRRRRRRRRRR !!!!"
(ps, I have brought this discussion on it. arti.fotografia.digitale at this link:
result is an interesting thread)
( update June 22, today I noticed that turning on Dcresource;
""""{ Wednesday, July 22, 2009}
Forum registration amnesty weekend
If You've Been Trying to register for Our forums and have one of the banned email domains, this Friday through Sunday you'll be Able to join without a problem. Mark your calendar !""""
The Anglo-Saxon culture has always been more pragmatic ;-)

Friday, July 17, 2009

Why Is A Platypus A Good Pet

underwater digital camera: which compact?


Canon D10, Pentax W60, Olympus 8000, ecc.Qual 'is the best compact Digital for our holiday at the sea water? With what capture fish and the underwater snorkeling during our walks in?
We suffered a couple of links to test / review on various models;
1) THIS , which shows the Canon D10, Fuji Z33, the Olympus 6000 and 8000, the Pentax W60 and W80, the Panasonic site TF1dall'autorevole of DPReview.
2) THIS , which shows the Canon D10, Fuji Z33, the 8000 Olympus, Panasonic FT1, hosted by Trusted Reviews.
From these tests it out in front, as image quality, the Canon D10, but the Panasonic and Pentax W60 FT1 bene.Ottima leaving the yield of Lumix FT1 at high ISO.
The Canon D10 and the Olympus 8000 also have the advantage of being "Waterproof" to a depth of 10 meters., Also reached an interesting new Pentax W80 , while others are limited to 3-4 mt.Le Pentax, and Panasonic are nominated movies in HD at 720p, which the Canon D10 fa.La not, however, has half diaphragm being more wide-angle, which is under water can help.
other hand, the Pentax W60 and W80 and the Panasonic-FT1 dellla against the Canon D10, 35-105 zoom has a focal range more widely, with 28mm wide angle to telephoto and about 130-140mm, which enrich the shots and possible compositions. Here

HERE an interesting debate, full of ideas for choice.
Instead, HERE una comparazione tecnica fra le varie compatte subacquee.
Infine,va ricordato che la garanzia di impermeabilità di solito si limita a 2 ore di uso,circa.

PREZZO (circa,online)
Canon D10 - 280 euro
Fuji Z33 - 160 eur0
Olympus mju 6000 - 230 euro
Olympus mju 8000 - 280 euro
Panasonic FT1 - 295 euro
Pentax W60 - 215 euro
Pentax W80 - non ancora disponibile

Monday, July 13, 2009

Heathrow Gay Meeting Contact

Canon A2000 IS vs Nikon S560: € 150 compact compared

Nella fascia di prezzo intorno ai 150 euro ci sono 2 compatte di due famose case fotografiche ; la Canon Powershot A2000 IS e la Nikon Coolpix S560.
Si tratta di 2 macchine compatte da 10 megapixel di discreta qualità fotografica.Peccato solo per il loro grandangolo che parte da 35mm,ormai anche on the economic end machines should be put at least a 28mm.
Here they are with their strengths:

CANON POWERSHOT A2000 IS



- Better image quality
- Better performance at high ISO
- the most powerful Tele (216mm vs 175mm)
- Maximum time longer (16 sec. vs 4 sec.)
- Marco closer (1cm. vs 10cm).
- slightly larger LCD (3 "vs. 2.7")

NIKON COOLPIX S560

- Internal memory 44MB vs. 0)
- Smaller and lighter
- Available in 3 colors (black, champagne, pink)

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Preowned Black White Wedding Dress

Digital Camera and Video: HD or quality of the sound / audio? Fuji S2000HD vs.

Many buy compact digital cameras taking care of only the visual quality of video watching but not taking care of the sound.
If the "movie" HD is 720p or 1080p, then okay.
But the differences in sound quality are not poco.Ecco 2 examples:



This is a video made with the Panasonic TZ5, with a compact 8-bit mono audio and 8 khz



This video clip was shot with the next model, the Panasonic TZ7 (or ZS3) and an audio stereo Dolby 16-bit, 48 khz.

The difference is great, especially for those who love music and Concertos first case the sounds are "capped" closed, appear as heard through a heavy blanket.
In the second case, the sound is much more realistic and rich in nuances and frequencies.
MONO / STEREO = You already know: having two sources instead of one is better, as have two ears instead of one.
BIT = The depth of sound. It gives a higher resolution, just as in the photo resolution: nitide.Le things are more voices and instruments are better separated from each other, less impastati.Meglio 16-bit 8-bit, etc..
KHZ = suono.Se The frequency of attendance is limited, stamps lower will not be returned in their deep resonance and vibration and high tones will not have the purity and acutezza.Tutto will be compressed and flattened on a few frequencies, as happens with the dynamic range of levels for luminostà.Anche khz, 22 is better than 11:44 is better than 22, ecc.Il musical sampling of the CDs is 44.1 kHz.

DATA QUALITY 'IN SOME AUDIO COMPACT

CANON A1000 IS, mono, 8bit, 11kHz
S5, stereo, 16 bit, 44kHz
SX1, stereo, 16 bit, 44kHz
SX10, stereo, 16-bit, 44kHz
SX110, mono, 8-bit, 11kHz
SX200, mono, 16 bit, 44kHz
G10, mono, 16bit, 44kHz
Ixus 100; mono, 16 bit, 44khz
Ixus 110; mono , 16 bit, 44khz
Ixus 900; mono, 16 bit, 44khz
Ixus 990; mono, 16 bit, 44khz

FUJI
F200exr; mono, 8 bit, 11khz
F2000HD; mono, 16 bit, 48khz
F100sf; mono, 8 bit, 11khz

NIKON
P6000; mono, 8bit, 8khz
P90; mono, 8 bit, 8khz

PANASONIC
TZ5; mono, 8 bit, 8khz
TZ7(zs3); stereo, 16 bit, 48khz
FZ18; mono, 8 bit, 8khz
FZ28; mono,16 bit, 16khz
LX3; mono, 16 bit, 16khz

SAMSUNG
WB500; stereo, 16 bit, 44khz
WB550; stereo, 16 bit, 32kHz

SONY
HX1, stereo, 16 bit, 48kHz
H20, mono, 16 bit, 24kHz
T90, mono, 16 bit, 24kHz
T900, stereo, 16 bit, 24kHz

To complete the summary, it should be noted that
- also encode and their bitrate (the volume of data in kb / sec.) have a certain weight, but the specifications are often incomplete and you have to make do with what special programs EXIF video or looking on forums and websites of the manufacturers.
- another element that can make a difference beyond the data is the presence of devices or wind noise on the microphone that the sound can lose wealth, "cork". This explains the different performance of some machines than others despite the audio data tell a different numerical cosa.In this case it is best to compare the many trials comparing video on Youtube where there is the human voice, and video in an outdoor quiet place to see if there is background noise and to what extent.

Monday, July 6, 2009

Terra Cotta Paint Bedroom

. Nikon L100: bridge ultrazoom below 200 € in confronto

ultrazoom The bridge is a category of compact and usually have a price above 250 euro.
Today we offer two low-priced: The Fuji Finepix S2000HD and Nikon Coolpix L100, both 10 megapixel and 28-420mm focal length, range suitable for all situazioni.Da some detail the difference in image quality with the most expensive, you see, but not all are perfectionists ...
Here they are with their strengths:

FUJI FINEPIX S2000HD
- Autofocus faster
- Choice of manual ISO
- adapter filters
- Movies HD (720p vs. 480)
- -Can use manual zoom during Movie
- rates slightly lower (185 vs.. € 195, about, online)

NIKON COOLPIX L100



- Manual of priority diaphragm
- faster short time (1 / 2000 vs. 1 / 1000)
- long time slower (vs. 8sec.. 4sec.)
- Macro closer (vs. 1cm.. 10cm.)
- LCD leggermente più grande (3" vs. 2.7")
--Più leggera

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Boston Mandingo Party

Panasonic TZ6 vs. Samsung WB550 : compatte superzoom grandangolari a confronto

Molti cercano una fotocamera compatta tuttofare ed automatica,ben portabile ma ambiziosa e adatta a tutte le situazioni.Ecco 2 compatte grandangolari superzoom a confronto:la Panasonic TZ6 (o zs1) e la Samsung WB550 (o HZ15W).
Si tratta di macchine con rispettivamente 10 e 12 megapixel che partono da grandangoli davvero versatili -25 e 24 mm- con una vocazione per gli ambienti stretti ma con un occhio anche alla potenza dello zoom per i particolari lontani.
Eccole coi loro rispettivi vantaggi:

PANASONIC LUMIX TZ6



--Miglior
image quality - Best image quality at high ISO
- the most powerful telephoto zoom (300mm vs. 240mm)
- Objective brighter with long lenses (f/4.9 vs. 5.8)
- A little smaller and lighter
- Lightweight longer battery life (300 vs. 270, CIPA)
- Price less (235 vs.. € 260, about, online)

SAMSUNG WB550

- Lightweight higher resolution image (but only about a 2x teleconverter)
- Possibility of manual focus
- Movies HD (720p vs. 480, but at low bitrate)
- defined and larger LCD (3 "/ 460,000 vs 2.7." / 230,000)
- HDMI

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Colorado Drivers License Template

Canon powershot SX110 IS vs. Sony cybershot H20 ; compatte superzoom 10x a confronto

Comparison Specifications SX110 IS-H20 Sony
Canon PowerShot SX110 and Sony Cybershot H20, two classical compact 10x superzoom, respectively, with 9 and 10 million pixels, full control manuali.La SX110 is powered by 2 AA batteries, the batteries with H20 litio.Eccole with their respective strengths;

CANON POWERSHOT SX110



- Better performance at high ISO image
- Purple fringing slightly lower
- Manual control of the fire-vs. semi-manual 5 steps
- Higher brightness at wide angle (2.8 vs. 3.5,)
- Price less (185 vs.. € 220, about, online)

SONY CYBERSHOT H20

- Light
higher resolution image - the most powerful Flash (7 meters. Vs. 3 mt.)
- short bursts faster (1.8 fps vs. 0 , 7 / 1, 2fps)
- adapter to mount filters
- Movies HD (720p vs. 480)
- HDMI connection

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Easton ‘x-treme’ Slowpitch

Canon ixus 100 is vs. Sony cybershot T90;ultrasottili a confronto

For those seeking a compact or ultra-ultra-slim - a shirt pocket, here compared to the Canon Ixus 100 (SD780 is outside Europe) and the Sony Cyber-shot cameras T90.Due 12 million pixels available in various colors, a touch of fashion, and with advanced features such as HDMI (with optional accessory. for the Sony), HD video clips at 720p and, in the case of Sony, the touchscreen.In both, image quality suffers a bit compromised with the miniaturization.
Here they are with their mutual strengths:

CANON IXUS 100 IS

- Image quality slightly better
- Presence of sight (though small)
- Macro closer (vs. 3cm.. 8 cm.)
- HDMI output without the need for optional accessories
- Price less (195 € vs.240, about, online)

SONY CYBERSHOT T90

- Focus range wider (35-140 vs. 33-100mm)
- Gust faster (1.8 vs. 0.8 fps)
- larger LCD (3 "vs. 2.5.)
- Touchscreen
- Manual focus (in 5 steps)

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Install Bathtub On Concrete Floor

La compatta digitale da 100 euro ; Canon Powershot a480 vs. Nikon coolpix L20

Link Comparison Specifications Canon Powershot A480, Nikon Coolpix L20
Often we read of people applying for a digital camera low price, also known as a low cost "budget room". For a very usable compact would be better to spend more, but the availability in times of economic crisis are what they are ... So, here are two 10-megapixel Canon and Nikon confronto.Per those interested also in two sisters 8 megapixel cost even lower, the A470 and the L19.

CANON POWERSHOT A480

- Image quality slightly better
- Has the management of ISO
- Objective brighter (3.0-5.8 vs. 3.1-6.7)
- on average, faster autofocus and power
- Improved performance at high ISO / low light
- lowest cost (95 vs. 105 euros, about, online)

NIKON COOLPIX L20

- Minor purple fringing
- defined and larger LCD (3 " / 230,000 vs.2.5 "/ 115,000)
- short bursts faster (1.4 fps vs. 0.8 fps) Here are 2

Monday, June 29, 2009

How To Make Fireman Sam Background

Fuji finepix S100fs vs.Sony cybershot HX1 ; bridge ultrazoom a confronto

ultrazoom bridge at the top of the range for two famous brands, and Fuji are in Canon.Entrambe high-end but less than 400 € (about online).
The S100fs is a powerful (for volume and weight) digital camera classic photographic vocation, the HX1 is a vocation to the latest generation compact hybrid, with various technological features. A larger sensor
some performance benefits of Fuji cameras, but the multimedia will be covered by Sony.
As for the Canon SX1 and the Nikon D90, Fuji and Sony also has the unfortunate tendency to throw high-end cameras on the market with a purple fringing inaccettabile.Eccole described with mutual benefits:

FUJI FINEPIX S100FS


-
higher resolution images - images wider dynamic range
- best image quality at high ISO
- Save Raw
- also uses a proprietary memory format (SD)
- Internal Memory bigger (25 vs. 11 MB.)
- Feature film simulation curves
- Remote control (optional)

SONY CYBERSHOT HX1

- Purple fringing slightly lower
- Much smaller and light
- widest focal range (28-560 vs. 28-400)
- Gust faster (10/5/2 fps up to 10 shots vs. 3fps up to 7 shots)
--Filmati HD (720p e 1440x1080 vs. 480)
--Attacco HDMI
--Maggior durata batterie (390 vs. 250,cipa)
--LCD più grande (3" vs. 2,5")
--Funzione di incollaggio automatico per le foto-panoramiche